Jurnal Sosial dan Teknologi (SOSTECH)
Volume 2, Number 1, January 2022
p-ISSN 2774-5147 ; e-ISSN 2774-5155
How to cite:
Alifal Hamdan
1
, Ismu Rini Dwi Ari
2
and Imma Widyawati Agustin
3
. (2022). Environmental Sustainability
Improvement of Malang City Based on Local Sustainability. Jurnal Sosial dan Teknologi (SOSTECH), 2(1):
1.753-1.764
E-ISSN:
2774-5155
Published by:
https://greenpublisher.id/
ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY IMPROVEMENT OF MALANG CITY
BASED ON LOCAL SUSTAINABILITY
Alifal Hamdan
1
, Ismu Rini Dwi Ari
2
and Imma Widyawati Agustin
3
Brawijaya University, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Indonesia
1,2 and 3
alifalhamdan@student.ub.ac.id
1
, dwiari@ub.ac.id
2
and immasaitama@ub.ac.id
3
Abstract
Background: Malang City is a city that has a function as an area of education, industry, trade,
and services so that it is experiencing fairly rapid development. These developments often only
pursue economic and social aspects, causing problems in environmental aspects.
Research purposes: Assessing the environmental sustainability index in all urban villages in
Malang City, analyze the indicators that affect the environmental sustainability index in all urban
villages in Malang City and prepare recommendations for improving environmental
sustainability in Malang City.
Research methods: The method used is Multi-Dimensional Scaling (MDS) through the Rapid
Appraisal for Sustainable Development (RAP-SUSDEV) ordination technique approach modified
from RAPFISH, which is a sustainability analysis used to determine status and identify sensitive
indicators in the process of knowing sustainability. The MDS method can provide stable results
compared to multivariate analysis methods such as factor analysis.
Research results: The results of the index display indicators that are sensitive or have an effect
on sustainability, which are useful as reference materials in compiling recommendations for
improving environmental sustainability in Malang City.
Conclusion: The urban areas that have the highest environmental sustainability index values are
Tasikmadu and Tunggulwulung Urban Villages with very sustainable status. Meanwhile, the
kelurahan that has the smallest environmental sustainability index value is Kotalama Urban
Village with unsustainable status. The results of the leverage analysis show that the factors that
have a significant effect on environmental sustainability are anticipation and mitigation efforts,
namely as many as 23 urban villages. Based on the analysis that has been done, the
recommendations for improving environmental sustainability in Malang City are prioritized to
build anticipation and mitigation efforts such as early warning systems, safety equipment, and
signs, and disaster evacuation routes. The prioritized recommendations were taken based on the
most recommendations given to 57 urban villages in Malang City.
Keywords: Environmental Sustainability, Sustainable Development, Local Sustainability,
Multi-Dimensional Scaling
Abstrak
Latar belakang: Kota Malang merupakan kota yang memiliki fungsi sebagai kawasan
pendidikan, industri, perdagangan, dan jasa sehingga mengalami perkembangan yang cukup
pesat. Perkembangan tersebut seringkali hanya mengejar aspek ekonomi dan sosial sehingga
menimbulkan permasalahan pada aspek lingkungan.
Tujuan penelitian: Mengkaji indeks kelestarian lingkungan di seluruh kelurahan di Kota
Malang, menganalisis indikator-indikator yang mempengaruhi indeks kelestarian lingkungan di
seluruh kelurahan di Kota Malang dan menyusun rekomendasi peningkatan kelestarian
lingkungan di Kota Malang.
Metode penelitian: Metode yang digunakan adalah Multi-Dimensional Scaling (MDS) melalui
pendekatan teknik ordinasi Rapid Appraisal for Sustainable Development (RAP-SUSDEV) yang
dimodifikasi dari RAPFISH, yaitu analisis keberlanjutan yang digunakan untuk menentukan
status dan mengidentifikasi indikator sensitif dalam proses mengetahui keberlanjutan. Metode
MDS dapat memberikan hasil yang stabil dibandingkan dengan metode analisis multivariat
seperti analisis faktor.
Hasil penelitian: Hasil indeks menampilkan indikator-indikator yang sensitif atau berpengaruh
terhadap kelestarian, yang berguna sebagai bahan acuan dalam menyusun rekomendasi perbaikan
kelestarian lingkungan di Kota Malang.
Kesimpulan: Wilayah perkotaan yang memiliki nilai indeks kelestarian lingkungan tertinggi
Environmental Sustainability Improvement of Malang
City Based on Local Sustainability
e-ISSN 2774-5155
p-ISSN 2774-5147
Alifal Hamdan
1
, Ismu Rini Dwi Ari
2
and Imma Widyawati Agustin
3
1.754
adalah Kelurahan Tasikmadu dan Kelurahan Tunggulwulung dengan status sangat lestari.
Sedangkan kelurahan yang memiliki nilai indeks kelestarian lingkungan terkecil adalah
Kelurahan Kotalama dengan status tidak lestari. Hasil analisis leverage menunjukkan bahwa
faktor yang berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kelestarian lingkungan adalah upaya antisipasi dan
mitigasi yaitu sebanyak 23 kelurahan. Berdasarkan analisis yang telah dilakukan, rekomendasi
untuk peningkatan kelestarian lingkungan di Kota Malang diprioritaskan untuk membangun
upaya antisipasi dan mitigasi seperti sistem peringatan dini, peralatan keselamatan, dan rambu-
rambu, serta jalur evakuasi bencana. Rekomendasi yang diprioritaskan diambil berdasarkan
rekomendasi yang paling banyak diberikan kepada 57 kelurahan di Kota Malang.
Kata kunci: Kelestarian Lingkungan, Pembangunan Berkelanjutan, Keberlanjutan Lokal,
Penskalaan Multi-Dimensi
Diterima: 26-11-2021; Direvisi: 29-11-2021; Disetujui: 15-01-2022
INTRODUCTION
The process to achieve sustainable development is currently trying to be achieved
by cities in Indonesia, including Malang City, in the Malang City Medium Term
Development Plan (RPJMD) report for 2019-2023 is to create a productive and
competitive city based on a creative economy, sustainability and integration (Pemerintah
Kota Malang, 2018). Sustainable development is a development that meets the needs of
the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own
needs (Rustiadi et al., 2011). Sustainable development is an important effort to achieve so
that the development carried out does not only pursue economic and social aspects but
also must pay attention to the environment. One aspect of sustainable development is the
environment furthermore, the notion of a sustainable environment is a condition of
balance, resilience, and interconnectedness so that humans are enabled to meet their
needs without exceeding the capacity of the supporting ecosystem, and can regenerate to
continue to meet future needs (Effendi et al., 2018). To find out the achievements of
environmentally-based sustainable development in Malang City, useful indicators are
needed to help achieve sustainability targets, inform about the weaknesses and strengths
of indicators, inform policymakers and the public about the condition of their area, and
are useful for determining priorities (Pupphachai & Zuidema, 2017).
Malang City is a city that has a function as an area of education, industry, trade, and
services so that it is experiencing fairly rapid development. The development often only
pursues the economic aspect, causing problems in the environmental aspect. Problems in
the environmental aspect are natural disasters. Malang City is an area that has the
potential to be prone to natural disasters. However, Malang City's resilience to disasters is
still not maximized (Rusli & Ulya, 2018). Natural disasters have a major impact on
humans and the environment, so it is necessary to anticipate and mitigate early warning
systems and safety equipment (BPS, 2013). The next problem is land, the area of
residential land increased by 54.99% in 2016, and the area of rice fields decreased by
84.10% in the same year. The change in land use resulted in the critical land area in
Malang City being 52.72% of the total area (Santoso & Nurumudin, 2020). The land is
part of the three main factors of production and is something that is needed in the housing
and agriculture sectors, to accommodate policymaking materials and sustainable land use
planning, information on land areas such as rice fields, non-rice fields agricultural lands
such as dry land /gardens, fields/ huma, and land that is temporarily not cultivated (BPS,
2013).
Another problem faced by Malang City is the measurement of sustainable
environmental development which is currently only carried out at the city scale, there is
no measurement at the scale of the local or urban village. Measurement of local
Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1.753-1.764, January 2022
1.755 http://sostech.greenvest.co.id
sustainability is useful to assist the government in making a policy or program so that it
can prioritize and optimize in zones or areas that have a low sustainability index
(Pravitasari et al., 2016). The selection of sub-districts as an effort to create a sustainable
environment is supported in the Village Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
document which was later issued by the Minister of Villages for Development of
Disadvantaged Regions and Transmigration Regulation Number 13 of 2020 which
regulates the use of village funds and efforts to achieve the SDGs. The Village SDGs
document is a derivative of Presidential Regulation Number 59 of 2017 concerning the
implementation of achieving sustainable national development goals.
Based on this urgency, this research is expected to contribute to improving the sustainable
environment of Malang City based on the local sustainability index, while the objectives to be
achieved are assessing the environmental sustainability index in all urban villages in Malang City;
analyze the indicators that affect the environmental sustainability index in all urban villages in
Malang City and prepare recommendations for improving environmental sustainability in Malang
City.
RESEARCH METHOD
The method used is Multi-Dimensional Scaling (MDS) through the Rapid
Appraisal for Sustainable Development (RAP-SUSDEV) ordination technique approach
modified from RAPFISH, which is a sustainability analysis used to determine status and
identify sensitive indicators in the process of knowing sustainability. The MDS method
can provide stable results compared to multivariate analysis methods such as factor
analysis (Pitcher et al., 2013).
The data to be used in this study is secondary data, which in its meaning is a source of
data sourced from written data such as literature, scientific studies, and so on (Sugiyono,
2017). The data covers all sub-districts in Malang City, totaling 57 sub-districts see Table
3. The data in question consists of variables and indicators that are sourced based on
considerations from previous research and are associated with problems in Malang City,
see Table 1.
Table 1. Variables, Indicators, and Relationships with Problems in Malang City.
Variable
Indicator
Code
Relationship with
Problems in Malang
City
Environment
(Apriyanto et al., 2015)
Natural disaster
incident (BPS,
2013)
X1
The Malang City area is
an area that is
vulnerable to natural
disasters (Rusli & Ulya,
2018).
Victims of natural
disasters (BPS,
2013)
X2
Anticipation and
mitigation efforts
(BPS, 2013)
X3
Rice field area
(BPS, 2013)
X4
The increase in
residential land area is
accompanied by an
increase in critical land
(Santoso & Nurumudin,
2020)
Area of dry
land/gardens and
fields/huma (BPS,
2013)
X5
Area of land that is
temporarily
X6
Environmental Sustainability Improvement of Malang
City Based on Local Sustainability
e-ISSN 2774-5155
p-ISSN 2774-5147
Alifal Hamdan
1
, Ismu Rini Dwi Ari
2
and Imma Widyawati Agustin
3
1.754
Variable
Indicator
Code
Relationship with
Problems in Malang
City
uncultivated (BPS,
2013)
Source: BPS (2013); Apriyanto et al (2015); Rusli & Ulya (2018); Santoso & Nurumudin
(2020).
The Multi-Dimensional Scaling (MDS) method is used to describe geometric
spaces through the similarity and inequality of variables (Borg & Patrick J.F., 2005), the
approach used is the Rapid Appraisal for Sustainable Development (RAP-SUSDEV)
ordinance technique modified from RAPFISH.
The RAP-SUSDEV analysis is used to assess the environmental sustainability
index in all urban villages in Malang City. The analysis process goes through several
stages, the first of which is to assess each indicator on an ordinal scale based on
sustainability criteria. The scoring is based on facts in the field according to
predetermined criteria by giving a score of 0 to 3, which means bad (0), moderate (1),
good (2), and very good (3) (Suwarno et al., 2011). Number 3 is the maximum number of
good numbers, while 0 is the minimum number or bad number.
The second is the ordination stage for each indicator that has been previously
assessed. The ordination technique in MDS is based on the Euclidean distance, which is
manifested in dimensional space and can be written as the configuration or ordination of a
point or object, resulting in the position of the sustainability status of the object being
observed and then projected on a horizontal line with different levels of coordination
between bad points. and the good point (good) which the index value is between 0 to
100% (Fauzi & Anna, 2005) see table 2.
Table 2. Sustainability Status Index Value.
Index Value
Category
0,00 – 25,00
Bad (unsustainable)
25,01 – 50,00
Less (less sustainable)
50,01 – 75,00
Enough (sustainable enough)
75,01 – 100,00
Good (very sustainable)
Source: Fauzi & Anna (2005).
The accuracy of the results of the sustainability index analysis can be verified using
R
2
(coefficient of determination) and stress values, low-stress values indicate good fit,
and high-stress values indicate bad fit, the tolerance limit for random values is 0.25
(Fauzi & Anna, 2005). The value of R2 is also used to verify whether or not additional
indicators are needed. It should be noted that if the R
2
value is close to 1 (100%) then the
results of the analysis are said to be quite good (Kavanagh & Pitcher, 2004).
The third is leverage analysis which is used to analyze indicators that affect the
environmental sustainability index in all urban villages in Malang City. The results of the
analysis are used as a reference in formulating recommendations for improving
environmental sustainability in the city of Malang. Determination of sensitive
attributes/indicators based on the order of priority on the results of the leverage analysis,
by looking at the shape of the change in Root Mean Square (RMS) on the X-axis. The
greater the RMS value on the attributes/indicators, the greater the sensitivity or influence
on the sustainability status (Kavanagh & Pitcher, 2004).
Fourth is the Monte Carlo analysis which is used to estimate the impact of the error
at the 95% confidence level (Fauzi & Anna, 2005), which is then compared with the
1.756
Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1.753-1.764, January 2022
1.757 http://sostech.greenvest.co.id
value of the Multi-Dimensional Scaling index. The analysis serves to verify the indicators
used in measuring the sustainability index, which can be done by looking at the difference
between the Monte Carlo index and the sustainability index in findin
g the smallest difference (Hidayanto et al., 2009), thus ensuring that there are no errors in
the measurement of the sustainability index value.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Based on the results of the RAP-SUSDEV analysis to answer goal 1, the
environmental sustainability index value is obtained. These index values produce stress
values that are all still below the random value limit of 0.25 and R
2
(coefficient of
determination) is close to 1, meaning that the results of the RAP-SUSDEV analysis are
accurate. Likewise, the Monte Carlo analysis is used to see the impact of random errors
from each indicator. The results of the Monte Carlo analysis carried out with 25 iterations
show that the sustainability index is at a 95% confidence interval or has a difference of
less than 5% from the results of the RAP-SUSDEV analysis, then these results qualify as
an estimator of the sustainability index value.
Table 3. Environmental Sustainability Index (ESI), Monte Carlo Index (MCI),
Sustainability Sensitive Indicators (SSI).
Urban Villages
ESI
Stress
R
2
MCI
SSI (Code)
RMS value
Arjowina-ngun
53,54
0,15
0,92
53,00
X3
14,65
Tlogowaru
53,54
0,15
0,92
53,07
X3
14,65
Wonokoyo
53,54
0,15
0,92
52,91
X3
14,65
Bumiayu
49,23
0,15
0,94
49,00
X3
9,66
Buring
53,54
0,15
0,92
53,34
X3
14,65
Mergosono
33,79
0,15
0,94
33,02
X3
7,68
Kotalama
16,08
0,14
0,94
15,55
X2
5,47
Kedung-kandang
53,44
0,15
0,94
53,05
X4
8,91
Sawojajar
62,28
0,15
0,94
61,66
X5
11,27
Madyopuro
47,40
0,14
0,93
47,32
X3
12,25
Lesanpuro
42,43
0,15
0,94
42,06
X3
8,80
Cemoro-kandang
53,71
0,14
0,93
53,60
X4
14,16
Kebonsari
41,88
0,14
0,94
41,69
X1
10,63
Gadang
48,71
0,14
0,94
48,45
X3
11,33
Ciptomulyo
35,53
0,14
0,94
35,17
X1
13,64
Sukun
45,36
0,15
0,94
44,75
X3
9,02
Bandung-rejosari
54,26
0,15
0,94
53,52
X3
9,59
Bakalan Krajan
69,74
0,15
0,92
67,20
X3
13,33
Mulyorejo
62,42
0,14
0,93
61,00
X3
11,79
Bandulan
54,26
0,15
0,94
53,52
X3
9,59
Tanjungrejo
44,04
0,15
0,92
43,13
X3
15,66
Pisang Candi
44,82
0,15
0,94
44,40
X3
7,07
Karang-besuki
53,13
0,15
0,93
52,59
X3
9,68
Kasin
49,99
0,14
0,94
49,51
X4
14,18
Sukoharjo
49,99
0,14
0,94
49,99
X4
14,18
Kidul Dalem
49,99
0,14
0,94
49,52
X4
14,18
Kauman
49,99
0,14
0,94
49,24
X4
14,18
Bareng
49,99
0,14
0,94
49,00
X4
14,18
Gadingkasri
49,99
0,14
0,94
49,98
X4
14,18
Oro Oro Dowo
44,44
0,14
0,94
44,17
X3
13,93
Klojen
49,99
0,14
0,94
49,99
X4
14,18
Environmental Sustainability Improvement of Malang
City Based on Local Sustainability
e-ISSN 2774-5155
p-ISSN 2774-5147
Alifal Hamdan
1
, Ismu Rini Dwi Ari
2
and Imma Widyawati Agustin
3
1.758
Urban Villages
ESI
Stress
R
2
MCI
SSI (Code)
RMS value
Rampal Celaket
49,99
0,14
0,94
49,09
X4
14,18
Samaan
44,44
0,14
0,94
44,25
X3
13,93
Penanggungan
53,10
0,14
0,94
52,75
X4
14,15
Jodipan
23,74
0,14
0,95
22,77
X1
13,74
Polehan
35,19
0,15
0,94
35,02
X5
7,14
Kesatrian
35,53
0,14
0,94
35,03
X1
13,64
Bunulrejo
39,54
0,14
0,94
39,34
X1
11,06
Purwantoro
39,54
0,14
0,94
39,16
X1
11,06
Pandan-wangi
39,54
0,14
0,94
39,28
X1
11,06
Blimbing
39,54
0,14
0,94
39,12
X1
11,06
Purwodadi
39,54
0,14
0,94
39,11
X1
11,06
Polowijen
39,54
0,14
0,94
39,45
X1
11,06
Arjosari
42,40
0,14
0,94
42,26
X3
11,07
Balearjosari
46,42
0,14
0,94
46,02
X3
11,12
Merjosari
66,52
0,15
0,94
65,10
X4
10,54
Dinoyo
62,28
0,15
0,94
61,32
X5
11,27
Sumbersari
53,10
0,14
0,94
52,61
X4
14,15
Ketawanggede
49,99
0,14
0,94
49,24
X4
14,18
Jatimulyo
56,23
0,15
0,94
56,03
X3
8,64
Lowokwaru
53,10
0,14
0,94
52,94
X4
14,15
Tulusrejo
55,02
0,15
0,92
54,55
X4
16,84
Mojolangu
56,41
0,15
0,94
56,01
X3
6,96
Tunjung-sekar
67,46
0,15
0,94
66,38
X5
9,76
Tasikmadu
76,07
0,15
0,94
74,23
X5
12,81
Tunggulwulung
76,07
0,15
0,94
73,57
X5
12,81
Tlogomas
61,83
0,15
0,94
60,05
X4
9,00
Source: Analysis Result (2021).
Picture 1. Environmental Sustainability Index in 57 Urban Villages in Malang City.
Source: Analysis Result (2021).
Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1.753-1.764, January 2022
1.759 http://sostech.greenvest.co.id
Referring to table 3 and picture 1 regarding the environmental sustainability index,
it is known that the Tunggulwulung and Tasikmadu Urban Villages have the highest
environmental sustainability status with an index value of 76,07 meaning very sustainable
status, while the index value of Jodipan Urban Village is 23.74 and Kotalama Urban
Village is 16.08, having the lowest environmental sustainability index which means
unsustainable status.
The next process is leverage analysis which is carried out to answer objective 2,
which is to analyze indicators that affect the environmental sustainability index in all
urban villages in Malang City. Influential indicators need to be improved to support
environmental sustainability in all urban villages. The results of the analysis can be seen
in Table 3, the RMS value displayed is the highest value on the indicator.
Picture 2. Number of Indicators Sensitive to Environmental Sustainability Index in
Each Urban Villages. Source: Analysis Result (2021).
The results of the leverage analysis in table 3 are then summarized in picture 2,
showing that the natural disaster incident indicator is sensitive to the environmental
sustainability index in 10 urban villages, the victims of natural disasters indicator is
sensitive to the environmental sustainability index in 1 urban village, the anticipation and
mitigation efforts indicator is sensitive to the index. environmental sustainability in 23
urban villages, rice field area indicator is sensitive to environmental sustainability index
in 17 urban villages, area of dry land/gardens and fields/huma indicator is sensitive to
environmental sustainability index in 6 urban villages, and area of land that is temporarily
uncultivated indicator is not sensitive to the environmental sustainability index in all
urban villages.
The results of the leverage analysis are used to answer objective 3, namely as a
reference for compiling recommendations for improving environmental sustainability in
Malang City, see table 4.
Environmental Sustainability Improvement of Malang
City Based on Local Sustainability
e-ISSN 2774-5155
p-ISSN 2774-5147
Alifal Hamdan
1
, Ismu Rini Dwi Ari
2
and Imma Widyawati Agustin
3
1.760
Table 4. Recommendations for Improvement of Environmental Sustainability in Malang
City
Urban Villages
Recommendations
Arjowinangun
Build anticipatory and mitigation efforts such as early warning
systems, safety equipment, and disaster evacuation signs and
routes.
Tlogowaru
Build anticipatory and mitigation efforts such as early warning
systems, safety equipment, and disaster evacuation signs and
routes.
Wonokoyo
Build anticipatory and mitigation efforts such as early warning
systems, safety equipment, and disaster evacuation signs and
routes.
Bumiayu
Build anticipatory and mitigation efforts such as early warning
systems, safety equipment, and disaster evacuation signs and
routes.
Buring
Build anticipatory and mitigation efforts such as early warning
systems, safety equipment, and disaster evacuation signs and
routes.
Mergosono
Build anticipatory and mitigation efforts such as early warning
systems, safety equipment, and disaster evacuation signs and
routes.
Kotalama
Maintaining the number of survivors from natural disasters.
Kedungkandang
Maintain the number of existing paddy fields.
Sawojajar
Increase the area of dry land/garden/ and fields/huma and the like.
Madyopuro
Build anticipatory and mitigation efforts such as early warning
systems, safety equipment, and disaster evacuation signs and
routes.
Lesanpuro
Build anticipatory and mitigation efforts such as early warning
systems, safety equipment, and disaster evacuation signs and
routes.
Cemorokandang
Maintain the number of existing paddy fields.
Kebonsari
Be aware of natural disasters, and protect the environment to
minimize the occurrence of natural disasters.
Gadang
Build anticipatory and mitigation efforts such as early warning
systems, safety equipment, and disaster evacuation signs and
routes.
Ciptomulyo
Be aware of natural disasters, and protect the environment to
minimize the occurrence of natural disasters.
Sukun
Build anticipatory and mitigation efforts such as early warning
systems, safety equipment, and disaster evacuation signs and
routes.
Bandungrejosari
Build anticipatory and mitigation efforts such as early warning
systems, safety equipment, and disaster evacuation signs and
routes.
Bakalan Krajan
Build anticipatory and mitigation efforts such as early warning
systems, safety equipment, and disaster evacuation signs and
routes.
Mulyorejo
Build anticipatory and mitigation efforts such as early warning
systems, safety equipment, and disaster evacuation signs and
routes.
Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1.753-1.764, January 2022
1.761 http://sostech.greenvest.co.id
Urban Villages
Recommendations
Bandulan
Build anticipatory and mitigation efforts such as early warning
systems, safety equipment, and disaster evacuation signs and
routes.
Tanjungrejo
Build anticipatory and mitigation efforts such as early warning
systems, safety equipment, and disaster evacuation signs and
routes.
Pisang Candi
Build anticipatory and mitigation efforts such as early warning
systems, safety equipment, and disaster evacuation signs and
routes.
Karangbesuki
Build anticipatory and mitigation efforts such as early warning
systems, safety equipment, and disaster evacuation signs and
routes.
Kasin
Increase the area of rice fields and the like.
Sukoharjo
Increase the area of rice fields and the like.
Kidul Dalem
Increase the area of rice fields and the like.
Kauman
Increase the area of rice fields and the like.
Bareng
Increase the area of rice fields and the like.
Gadingkasri
Increase the area of rice fields and the like.
Oro Oro Dowo
Maintain and improve anticipatory and mitigation efforts such as
early warning systems, safety equipment, and disaster evacuation
signs and routes.
Klojen
Increase the area of rice fields and the like.
Rampal Celaket
Increase the area of rice fields and the like.
Samaan
Increase anticipation and mitigation efforts, such as early warning
systems, safety equipment, and disaster evacuation signs and
routes.
Penanggungan
Increase the area of rice fields and the like.
Jodipan
Be aware of natural disasters, and protect the environment to
minimize the occurrence of natural disasters.
Polehan
Increase the area of dry land/garden/ and fields/huma and the like.
Kesatrian
Be aware of natural disasters, and protect the environment to
minimize the occurrence of natural disasters.
Bunulrejo
Be aware of natural disasters, and protect the environment to
minimize the occurrence of natural disasters.
Purwantoro
Be aware of natural disasters, and protect the environment to
minimize the occurrence of natural disasters.
Pandanwangi
Be aware of natural disasters, and protect the environment to
minimize the occurrence of natural disasters.
Blimbing
Be aware of natural disasters, and protect the environment to
minimize the occurrence of natural disasters.
Purwodadi
Be aware of natural disasters, and protect the environment to
minimize the occurrence of natural disasters.
Polowijen
Be aware of natural disasters, and protect the environment to
minimize the occurrence of natural disasters.
Arjosari
Increase anticipation and mitigation efforts, such as early warning
systems, safety equipment, and disaster evacuation signs and
routes.
Balearjosari
Increase anticipation and mitigation efforts, such as early warning
Environmental Sustainability Improvement of Malang
City Based on Local Sustainability
e-ISSN 2774-5155
p-ISSN 2774-5147
Alifal Hamdan
1
, Ismu Rini Dwi Ari
2
and Imma Widyawati Agustin
3
1.762
Urban Villages
Recommendations
systems, safety equipment, and disaster evacuation signs and
routes.
Merjosari
Increase the area of rice fields and the like.
Dinoyo
Increase the area of dry land/garden/ and fields/huma and the like.
Sumbersari
Increase the area of rice fields and the like.
Ketawanggede
Increase the area of rice fields and the like.
Jatimulyo
Maintain and improve anticipatory and mitigation efforts such as
early warning systems, safety equipment, and disaster evacuation
signs and routes.
Lowokwaru
Increase the area of rice fields and the like.
Tulusrejo
Increase the area of rice fields and the like.
Mojolangu
Increase anticipation and mitigation efforts, such as early warning
systems, safety equipment, and disaster evacuation signs and
routes.
Tunjungsekar
Increase the area of dry land/garden/ and fields/huma and the like.
Tasikmadu
Increase the area of dry land/garden/ and fields/huma and the like.
Tunggulwulung
Increase the area of dry land/garden/ and fields/huma and the like.
Tlogomas
Increase the area of rice fields and the like.
Source: Analysis Result (2021).
The recommendations that have been made are expected to contribute to the
improvement of environmental sustainability in Malang City. Although these
recommendations are made for each urban village, if each urban village can improve
environmental sustainability in its area, it will support sustainability in the upper area
because every urban villages area in Malang City has spatial relationships and
relationships.
This research is a development of a previous study entitled Development of a Local
Sustainability Index in Pagar Alam City, South Sumatra (Nurahmatulah, 2019). The study
used factor analysis to calculate the value of the local sustainability index in each
dimension in each urban village, then to determine the factors that influence the local
sustainability index in Pagar Alam City, Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR)
analysis was used. Finally, to develop directions and recommendations for development
areas based on the local sustainability index in Pagar Alam City used descriptive analysis.
The difference with previous research is that this study uses RAP-SUSDEV
analysis modified from RAPFISH to measure the environmental sustainability index, then
to analyze the indicators that affect the environmental sustainability index in all urban
villages in Malang City, leverage analysis is used. The results of the analysis are used as a
reference for compiling recommendations for improving environmental sustainability in
the city of Malang.
CONCLUSION
The urban areas that have the highest environmental sustainability index values are
Tasikmadu and Tunggulwulung Urban Villages with very sustainable status. Meanwhile,
the kelurahan that has the smallest environmental sustainability index value is Kotalama
Urban Village with unsustainable status. The results of the leverage analysis show that
the factors that have a significant effect on environmental sustainability are anticipation
and mitigation efforts, namely as many as 23 urban villages. Based on the analysis that
has been done, the recommendations for improving environmental sustainability in
Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1.753-1.764, January 2022
1.763 http://sostech.greenvest.co.id
Malang City are prioritized to build anticipation and mitigation efforts such as early
warning systems, safety equipment, and signs, and disaster evacuation routes. The
prioritized recommendations were taken based on the most recommendations given to 57
urban villages in Malang City.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Apriyanto, H., Eriyatno, Rustiadi, E., & Mawardi, I. (2015). Status Berkelanjutan Kota Tangerang
Selatan-Banten Dengan Menggunakan Key Performance Indicators. Manusia Dan
Lingkungan, 22(2), 260–270.
Borg, I., & Patrick J.F., G. (2005). Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications
(Second Edi- tion). Journal of Statistical Software, 14.
BPS. (2013). Indikator Pembangunan Berkelanjutan. Badan Pusat Statistik, Jakarta-Indonesia.
Effendi, R., Salsabila, H., & Malik, A. (2018). Pemahaman Tentang Lingkungan Berkelanjutan.
Modul, 18(2), 75. https://doi.org/10.14710/mdl.18.2.2018.75-82
Fauzi, A., & Anna, S. (2005). Pemodelan sumber daya perikanan dan kelautan untuk analisis
kebijakan. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Hidayanto, M., S., S., Yahya, S., & Amien, L. I. (2009). Analisis Keberlanjutan Perkebunan
Kakao Rakyat di Kawasan Perbatasan Pulau Sebatik, Kabupaten Nunukan, Provinsi
Kalimantan Timur. Jurnal Agro Ekonomi, 27(2), 213.
https://doi.org/10.21082/jae.v27n2.2009.213-229
Kavanagh, P., & Pitcher, T. J. (2004). Implementing Microsoft Excel Software For. Fisheries
Centre Research Reports, 12(2), 75pp.
Nurahmatulah, A. (2019). Pengembangan indeks keberlanjutan lokal di kota pagar alam,
sumatera selatan arohman nurahmatulah. Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Pemerintah Kota Malang, 2018. (2018). RPJMD Kota malang 2018-2023. 388.
Pitcher, T. J., Lam, M. E., Ainsworth, C., Martindale, A., Nakamura, K., Perry, R. I., & Ward, T.
(2013). Improvements to Rapfish: a rapid evaluation technique for fisheries integrating
ecological and human dimensions. Journal of Fish Biology, 83(4), 865–889.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12122
Pravitasari, A. E., Saizen, I., & Rustiadi, E. (2016). Towards Resilience of Jabodetabek Megacity:
Developing Local Sustainability Index with Considering Local Spatial Interdependency.
International Journal of Sustainable Future for Human Security, 4(1), 27–34.
https://doi.org/10.24910/jsustain/4.1/2734
Pupphachai, U., & Zuidema, C. (2017). Sustainability indicators: A tool to generate learning and
adaptation in sustainable urban development. Ecological Indicators, 72, 784–793.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.09.016
Rusli, & Ulya, A. F. (2018). Peran Pemerintah Kota Malang Dalam Meningkatkan Kesiapsiagaan
Masyarakat Menghadapi Bencana (Studi Manajemen Bencana). Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu
Pengetahuan Sosial, 5(1), 1–13.
Rustiadi, E. (2011). Perencanaan dan pengembangan wilayah / Ernan Rustiadi, Sunsun
Saefulhakim, Dyah R. Panuju (S. Saefulhakim & D. R. Panuju (eds.)). Crestpent Press dan
Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Santoso, D. H., & Nurumudin, M. (2020). Valuasi Ekonomi Degradasi Lingkungan Akibat Alih
Fungsi Lahan di Kota Malang, Provinsi Jawa Timur. Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi
Lingkungan, 12(2), 121–130.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. CV Alfabeta.
Suwarno, J., Kartodiharjo, H., Pramudya, B., & Rachman, S. (2011). Policy Development of
Sustainable Watershed Management of Upper Ciliwung, Bogor Regency. Jurnal Analisis
Kebijakan Kehutanan, 8(2), 115–131.
