Adaptive Sovereignty and Co-Evolutionary Control: State Reconfiguration in Facing Middle Eastern Methamphetamine Networks in the Indian Ocean-Southeast Asia Corridor

R. Nurhadi Yuwono; Effendy  Lod Simanjutak

doi:10.59188/jurnalsostech.v6i7.32863

Authors

R. Nurhadi Yuwono Universitas Borobudur
Effendy Lod Simanjutak Universitas Borobudur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59188/jurnalsostech.v6i7.32863

Keywords:

Adaptive sovereignty, co-evolution, governance; methamphetamine networks, Middle East, Southeast Asia, control delivery, evolutionary governance theory

Abstract

This research analyzes the transformation of state sovereignty in responding to co-evolutionary transnational threats, focusing on methamphetamine networks connecting the Middle East and Southeast Asia via the Indian Ocean corridor. Using the framework of Evolutionary Governance Theory (EGT) and the concept of adaptive sovereignty, this study examined a case study of the uncovering of an international network that smuggled crystal meth in coffins using a drug hardening method, as well as the practice of control delivery that led to the discovery of a methamphetamine laboratory operated by Iranian nationals. This research finds that the state no longer acts as a rigid and territorial entity, but rather as an adaptive actor capable of reconfiguring its control instruments co-evolutionarily alongside the illegal networks it faces. This case demonstrates how the meth-hardening method represents the adaptation of criminal network technology to conventional detection systems, while control delivery shows the state's capacity for policy learning by adopting the network's logic in law enforcement operations. The theoretical implications of these findings indicate that sovereignty in the contemporary era must be understood as an adaptive capacity that continuously evolves through co-evolutionary interactions with transnational actors.

References

Amoo, O. O., Atadoga, A., Abrahams, T. O., Farayola, O. A., Osasona, F., & Ayinla, B. S. (2024). The legal landscape of cybercrime: A review of contemporary issues in the criminal justice system. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(2), 205–217.

Cao, Y. (2026). Laws, enforcement, and strategy: A multi-layered qualitative study of multinational enterprise compliance under European Union and Chinese data protection regimes. Policy & Internet, 18(2), e70037.

Dharani, S., Ali, S. F. B., Afrooz, H., Mohamed, E. M., Cook, P., Khan, M. A., & Rahman, Z. (2020). Development of methamphetamine abuse-deterrent formulations using sucrose acetate isobutyrate. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 109(3), 1338–1346.

Du, Y. (n.d.). From initiative to institution: China, the World Data Organization, and the politics of global data governance (SSRN Working Paper No. 6540131).

Esseiva, P., Ioset, S., Anglada, F., Gasté, L., Ribaux, O., Margot, P., Gallusser, A., Biedermann, A., Specht, Y., & Ottinger, E. (2007). Forensic drug intelligence: An important tool in law enforcement. Forensic Science International, 167(2–3), 247–254.

Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–473.

Hameiri, S., & Jones, L. (2015). Governing borderless threats: Non-traditional security and the politics of state transformation. Cambridge University Press.

Kavanagh, C. (2022). New tech, new threats, and new governance challenges: An opportunity to craft smarter responses? Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Kreutzmann, H. (2007). Afghanistan and the opium world market: Poppy production and trade. Iranian Studies, 40(5), 605–621.

Liu, Y., & Song, W. (2026). Navigating digital colonialism: Sovereignty models and development paths in the Global South. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, 102546.

Magliocca, N. R., McSweeney, K., Sesnie, S. E., Tellman, E., Devine, J. A., Nielsen, E. A., Pearson, Z., & Wrathall, D. J. (2019). Modeling cocaine traffickers and counterdrug interdiction forces as a complex adaptive system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(16), 7784–7792.

Malatji, M., & Tolah, A. (2025). Artificial intelligence (AI) cybersecurity dimensions: A comprehensive framework for understanding adversarial and offensive AI. AI and Ethics, 5(2), 883–910.

McCarthy-Jones, A., Doyle, C., & Turner, M. (2020). From hierarchies to networks: The organizational evolution of the international drug trade. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 63, 100436.

Okolo, F. C., Etukudoh, E. A., Ogunwole, O., Osho, G. O., & Basiru, J. O. (2021). Systematic review of cyber threats and resilience strategies across global supply chains and transportation networks. [Nama jurnal belum tersedia].

OCCRP. (2021). Report: Iran is a major transit point for the global meth trade.

Pearson, M. M., Rithmire, M., & Tsai, K. S. (2022). China's party-state capitalism and international backlash: From interdependence to insecurity. International Security, 47(2), 135–176.

Sa'beng, I., Ilham, I., & Paramita, M. H. (2021). Peran Direktorat Jenderal Bea dan Cukai Sulbagsel dalam mengawasi penyelundupan narkoba. Jurnal Pabean, 3(1), 95–108.

Su, R., & Zhang, D. (2025). Adaptive sovereignty: China's evolving legislative framework for transnational data governance. Politics and Governance, 13.

Suntsova, O. (2026). Geopolitical architecture of digital sovereignty: Strategic autonomy in the context of global technological fragmentation. Dalam O. Suntsova, A. Horbovyy, J. Prystrom, R. M. Boichuk, B. V. Grechanyk, I. Pogorielovska, E. Kuzionko-Ochrymiuk, & K. Wierzbicka, Digital sovereignty as a factor of competitiveness of the national economy (pp. 170–206). U-Sun.

Van Assche, K., Beunen, R., & Duineveld, M. (2014). Evolutionary governance theory: Theory and applications. Springer.

Van Assche, K., Beunen, R., Verweij, S., Evans, J., & Gruezmacher, M. (2021). Policy learning and adaptation in governance: A co-evolutionary perspective. Administration & Society, 54(7), 1226–1254.