Perluasan Aktor untuk Menjamin Implementasi Regulasi Bantuan Hukum di Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59188/jurnalsostech.v5i10.32468Keywords:
bantuan hukum, akses terhadap keadilan, pro bono, perluasan aktor, firma hukum swastaAbstract
Bantuan hukum merupakan elemen penting dalam menjamin akses terhadap keadilan bagi masyarakat miskin di Indonesia. Melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2011 tentang Bantuan Hukum, pemerintah Indonesia telah mengalokasikan anggaran negara untuk mendanai organisasi bantuan hukum dalam memberikan layanan gratis kepada kelompok rentan. Namun, implementasi kebijakan ini masih menghadapi tantangan signifikan, terutama keterbatasan jumlah dan distribusi organisasi bantuan hukum yang tidak mampu memenuhi keseluruhan kebutuhan keadilan masyarakat. Artikel ini menganalisis permasalahan implementasi bantuan hukum di Indonesia dan mengeksplorasi alternatif perluasan aktor yang dapat terlibat dalam penyediaan layanan bantuan hukum. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan yuridis-komparatif, membandingkan sistem bantuan hukum Indonesia dengan Australia. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa regulasi bantuan hukum di Indonesia perlu diperluas untuk melibatkan sektor swasta, khususnya firma hukum yang memberikan layanan pro bono. Berdasarkan teori governance triangle, keterlibatan tiga aktor negara, organisasi masyarakat sipil, dan sektor swasta diperlukan untuk menjamin efektivitas implementasi regulasi. Pengalaman Australia menunjukkan bahwa keterlibatan praktisi hukum swasta dapat memperluas ketersediaan layanan representasi hukum. Oleh karena itu, pembuat kebijakan di Indonesia perlu merevisi regulasi untuk mengintegrasikan peran firma hukum swasta dalam sistem bantuan hukum nasional.
References
Aripkah, N. (2023). Urgensi Bantuan Hukum Sebagai Wujud Perlindungan Anak Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Notary Law Journal, 2(4), 291–302. https://doi.org/10.32801/nolaj.v2i4.51
Abbott, K., & Snidal, D. (2008). The governance triangle: Regulatory standards institutions and the shadow of the state. Princeton University Press.
Abbott, M. (2018). Right of early access to criminal legal aid in Indonesia: Clearer rule, clearer violations. Indonesia Law Review, 8(1).
ABA Rule of Law Initiative (ABA RoLI). (2012). Access to justice assessment tool: A guide to analyzing access to justice for civil society organizations. American Bar Association.
Bedner, A., & Berenschot, W. (2011). Akses terhadap keadilan: An introduction to Indonesia’s struggle to make the law work for everyone. KITLV, HuMa, VVI Leiden University, Epistema Institute.
Budiarti, A., Wicaksana, D., Arianto, G., Aulia, K., Sutanti, K., Sabrina, G., Febry, P., Lestiana, F., Akdom, A., Putri, A., Christabel, V., & Harshita. (2023). Laporan penelitian: Survei kebutuhan hukum bagi kelompok rentan 2022. Indonesia Judicial Research Society (IJRS).
Cummings, S., de Sa e Silva, F., & Trubek, L. (2022). Global pro bono: Causes, context, and contestation. Cambridge University Press.
Huda, M., Astrvanapoe, S., Amalia, T., & Latifiani, D. (2023). Implementation of Law Number 16 of 2011 concerning Legal Aid as a form of implementation of the welfare law state concept. Indonesia Law Journal, 3, 166–180. https://doi.org/10.15294/ipmhi.v3i2.71410
Idris, A., Trisia, S., Violyta, M., & Pramesa, G. (2019). Pro bono: Prinsip dan praktik di Indonesia. Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.
INFID, & Indonesia Judicial Research Society (IJRS). (2020). Laporan studi kuantitatif barometer kesetaraan gender: Respons dan sikap masyarakat terhadap rancangan undang-undang penghapusan kekerasan seksual dan Undang-Undang No. 16 Tahun 2019 tentang perubahan Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1974 tentang perkawinan. INFID.
Kusumawati, M. (2016). Peran dan kedudukan Lembaga Bantuan Hukum sebagai access to justice bagi orang miskin. Arena Hukum Journal, 9(2), 166–180.
May, P. (2004). Compliance motivations: Affirmative and negative bases. Law & Society Review, 38(1).
Milane, E., Jackson, A., & Blane, N. (2023). Justice on the brink: Stronger legal aid for a better legal system. Impact Economics and Policy.
Ramadhan, C., et al. (2020). Legal need survey in Indonesia 2019 (Lampung and South Sulawesi Provinces). Indonesia Judicial Research Society (IJRS).
Roberts, A., & Lamp, N. (2021). Six faces of globalization: Who wins, who loses, and why it matters. Harvard University Press.
Sabatino, C. (2020). Access to justice: The people’s principle. Journal of the American Society on Aging, 43(4), 6–10.
Wicaksana, D., et al. (2020). Indonesian access to justice index 2019. Indonesia Consortium for Access to Justice Index.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dio Ashar Wicaksana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
