Tanggung Jawab Direksi Perusahaan Holding Bumn Terhadap Tindakan Anak Perusahaan Pada Tindak Pidana Korporasi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59188/jurnalsostech.v6i1.32632Keywords:
Holding BUMN, Tanggung Jawab Direksi, Pidana KorporasiAbstract
Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) sebagai salah satu pilar penopang perekonomian Indonesia dewasa ini mengalami transformasi guna mendorong BUMN menjadi badan usaha yang secara produktif dan efisien yaitu dengan membentuk perusahaan-perusahaan holding BUMN. Holding BUMN sebagai entitas induk secara operasional melakukan pengawasan maupun koordinasi kepada entitas anak perusahaan yang berada di dalam holding BUMN tersebut. Penelitian ini dilakukan guna mengetahui sejauh mana tanggung jawab Direksi holding BUMN sebagai induk terhadap tindakan anak perusahaannya yang mengalami kerugian terutama yang menimbulkan dampak pidana korporasi. Penelitian ini akan dilaksanakan dan tegolong sebagai penelitian yuridis normatif dengan melakukan analisa peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Adapun untuk data penelitian yang digunakan terdiri dari bahan hukum dan bahan non hukum melalui studi dokumen hukum dan studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa tanggung jawab Direksi induk perusahaan holding BUMN terhadap kerugian entitas anak perusahaan BUMN tidak dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban disebabkan adanya prinsip separate legal entity maupun limited liability kecuali dapat dibuktikan bahwa induk perusahaan memenuhi doktrin piercing the corporate veil.
References
Antunes, J. E. (2015). Liability of corporate groups: Autonomy and control in parent-subsidiary relationships in US, German and EU law. Kluwer Law International.
Arlen, J. (2022). Fiduciary duties to deter corporate misconduct. In Research handbook on corporate crime and financial misdealing (pp. 45–78). New York University School of Law.
Bainbridge, S. M., & Henderson, M. T. (2016). Limited liability: A legal and economic analysis. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Budustour, Y., & Budustour, L. (2023). The doctrine of separate legal personality and its significance in international business. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4384050
Cahn, A., & Donald, D. C. (2018). Comparative company law: Text and cases on the laws governing corporations in Germany, the UK and the USA. Cambridge University Press.
Dsouza, R. (2020). Corporate criminal liability and identification theory. Business Law Review, 41(3), 234–256.
Fisse, B., & Braithwaite, J. (2018). The allocation of responsibility for corporate crime: Individualism, collectivism and accountability. Sydney Law Review, 40(4), 468–513.
Friedmann, D., & Teubner, G. (2025). Criminological and socioeconomic aspects of corporate delinquency: A 21st century perspective. Journal of Financial Crime, 32(2), 145–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfc.2025.100895
Gobert, J., & Punch, M. (2021). Rethinking corporate crime (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Khimji, M. F., & Nicholls, C. C. (2015). Corporate veil piercing and allocation of liability – diagnosis and prognosis. Banking and Finance Law Review, 30(2), 211–245.
Micheler, E. (2024). Separate legal personality – an explanation and a defence. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 24(2), 301–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2024.2365170
Musacchio, A., & Lazzarini, S. G. (2014). Reinventing state capitalism: Leviathan in business, Brazil and beyond. Harvard University Press.
OECD. (2024). OECD guidelines on corporate governance of state-owned enterprises 2024. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/18a24f43-en
Pargendler, M. (2024). The fallacy of complete corporate separateness. Harvard Business Law Review, 14(1), 1–49.
Tanjung, M. (2020). A cross-firm analysis of corporate governance compliance and performance in Indonesia. Managerial Auditing Journal, 35(5), 621–643. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-06-2019-2328
Wahyuningrum, I. F. S., Chegenizadeh, A., Humaira, N. G., Budihardjo, M. A., & Nikraz, H. (2023). Corporate governance research in Asian countries: A bibliometric and content analysis (2001–2021). Sustainability, 15(8), 6789. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086789
Wells, C. (2017). Corporate criminal liability: A ten year review. Criminal Law Review, 2017(12), 849–867.
Witting, C. (2020). Piercing the corporate veil. In W. Day & S. Worthington (Eds.), Challenging private law, Lord Sumption on the Supreme Court (pp. 325–348). Hart Publishing.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nawungkrida Rio Pangestu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
