An LSTM-Based Framework For Short-Term Solana Price Prediction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59188/jurnalsostech.v6i2.32715Keywords:
Bitcoin price prediction, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Cryptocurrency market volatilityAbstract
This study examines short-term Bitcoin price dynamics using a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural network trained on hourly SOL/USDT data from the Binance exchange. To address the nonlinear and noise-dominated nature of cryptocurrency markets, the model is designed to capture momentum patterns and temporal dependencies rather than rely on linear forecasting assumptions. The prediction task, framed as a univariate regression problem with the daily high price as the target variable, is evaluated using a strictly out-of-sample framework. Empirical results show that despite considerable market volatility, the LSTM model demonstrates strong statistical performance. The model’s RMSE of 10.53, MAE of 8.76, MSE of 110.92, MAPE of 6.09%, and R² of 0.78 indicate that its nonlinear architecture captures a substantial portion of price volatility. In terms of absolute price, the model achieved an RMSE of USD 3,619.74, an MAE of USD 2,989.73, a MAPE of 2.82%, and an R² of 0.90, demonstrating its robustness in both normalized and real-scale assessments. Forecasts suggest that SOL prices are likely to decline from USD 88,425.62 to USD 85,497.88 over the next five days, reflecting a persistent short-term bearish trend with wide prediction intervals of around USD 6,000, indicating substantial uncertainty. These findings imply that LSTM models can effectively extract trend and regime-related information, making them valuable as risk-aware decision-support tools rather than deterministic forecasting systems—even though accurate short-term price-level prediction remains challenging.
References
Al Janabi, M. A. (2022). A novel modeling technique for the forecasting of multiple‐asset trading volumes: Innovative initial‐value‐problem differential equation algorithms for reinforcement machine learning. Complexity, 2022(1), 4965556.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4965556
Amarnadh, V., & Moparthi, N. R. (2024). Range control-based class imbalance and optimized granular elastic net regression feature selection for credit risk assessment. Knowledge and Information Systems, 66(9), 5281–5310.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-024-02010-1
Ayitey Junior, M., Appiahene, P., Appiah, O., & Bombie, C. N. (2023). Forex market forecasting using machine learning: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Journal of Big Data, 10(1), 9.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-022-00696-4
Bahoo, S., Cucculelli, M., Goga, X., & Mondolo, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence in finance: A comprehensive review through bibliometric and content analysis. SN Business & Economics, 4(2), 23.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-023-00491-1
Barzegar, R., Aalami, M. T., & Adamowski, J. (2020). Short-term water quality variable prediction using a hybrid CNN–LSTM deep learning model. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 34(2), 415–433.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-019-01776-2
Cabello-Solorzano, K., Ortigosa de Araujo, I., Peña, M., Correia, L., & Tallón-Ballesteros, A. J. (2023, August). The impact of data normalization on the accuracy of machine learning algorithms: A comparative analysis. In International Conference on Soft Computing Models in Industrial and Environmental Applications (pp. 344–353). Springer Nature Switzerland.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40688-7_33
Chen, X., & Biljecki, F. (2022). Mining real estate ads and property transactions for building and amenity data acquisition. Urban Informatics, 1(1), 12.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44212-022-00013-2
García-Medina, A., & Aguayo-Moreno, E. (2024). LSTM–GARCH hybrid model for the prediction of volatility in cryptocurrency portfolios. Computational Economics, 63(4), 1511–1542.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-023-10340-5
Hewamalage, H., Ackermann, K., & Bergmeir, C. (2023). Forecast evaluation for data scientists: Common pitfalls and best practices. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 37(2), 788–832.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-022-00889-4
Lucchetti, S., & Bruno, A. (2025, October). A comparative analysis of ARIMA and LSTM models for Bitcoin price prediction. In Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference (pp. 516–530). Springer Nature Switzerland.
Mailagaha Kumbure, M., & Luukka, P. (2022). A generalized fuzzy k-nearest neighbor regression model based on Minkowski distance. Granular Computing, 7(3), 657–671.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-021-00289-0
Naser, M. Z., & Alavi, A. H. (2023). Error metrics and performance fitness indicators for artificial intelligence and machine learning in engineering and sciences. Architecture, Structures and Construction, 3(4), 499–517.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44150-023-00072-9
Ogundokun, R. O., Maskeliunas, R., Misra, S., & Damaševičius, R. (2022, July). Improved CNN based on batch normalization and Adam optimizer. In International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications (pp. 593–604). Springer International Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10548-3_42
Reyad, M., Sarhan, A. M., & Arafa, M. (2023). A modified Adam algorithm for deep neural network optimization. Neural Computing and Applications, 35(23), 17095–17112.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-08674-9
Sharma, S., & Sen, S. (2023). Real-time structural damage assessment using LSTM networks: Regression and classification approaches. Neural Computing and Applications, 35(1), 557–572.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06579-8
Sirisha, U., Praveen, S. P., Srinivasu, P. N., Barsocchi, P., & Bhoi, A. K. (2023). Statistical analysis of design aspects of various YOLO-based deep learning models for object detection. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 16(1), 126.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44196-023-00206-3
Toai, T. K., Senkerik, R., Zelinka, I., Ulrich, A., Hanh, V. T. X., & Huan, V. M. (2022, June). ARIMA for short-term and LSTM for long-term in daily Bitcoin price prediction. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing (pp. 131–143). Springer International Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07005-7_11
Yıldırım, H., & Bekun, F. V. (2023). Predicting volatility of Bitcoin returns with ARCH, GARCH and EGARCH models. Future Business Journal, 9(1), 75.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Cevi Herdian

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.




